I recall a recent discussion between a
cousin and myself. At the time, he was in the process of moving.
Perhaps he shouldn't have mentioned he was throwing out some old
posters of his past concerts (he's a gospel singer), because I just
had to tell him that he ought to be saving some personal history. He
came back and said he didn't want to be a called a hoarder. I was
truly surprised at him, because he's been very interested in
everything I've been discovering so far on our mutual ancestor. And
just where did he think I was getting this information? I bet he
didn't put two and two together. *smile* He would be compiling his
own personal history for his descendants and I know he has at least
two.
Genealogists, historians, and
librarians consider journals, photo albums and scrapbooks as treasure
troves of information, because so few people keep them. If it weren't
for the keepers and savers, we wouldn't have materials to research
from. Thanks to a certain cable television show, which I've heard
this cousin mention from time to time, people are being led to
believe that collecting of any sort is a shameful thing and it makes
them fearful of being labeled a misfit of society, not realizing that
one poster in a scrapbook does not a hoarder make. This is yellow
journalism at its worst -- ridiculing the mentally ill who truly
cannot help themselves. Hence the consequences of a throw-a-way
society who are constantly bombarded with messages to buy, buy, buy.
At one time, thriftiness was considered a virtue.
And while I'm on the subject, I have
been urging my fellow paper artists not to recycle/upcycle old
ledgers, handwritten letters and ephemera to use in their artwork. In
these days of easy photocopying/scanning and printing, making a copy
and donating their flea-market finds to their local
genealogy/historical society makes perfect sense to me. If it hadn't
been for my thrifty great-grandmother and hence my grandmother, I
wouldn't have had Hannah's wonderful letters to scan and transcribe
like this one:
Dec 18,
'29
Dear
Tacy, So sorry to hear Laura had the small-pox and you had to be
vaccinated. Hope she did not have it very hard and that she is
getting along all right.
Am
sending a check for $3.00 to you to use wherever you most need it.
Ronald
wrote me about Laura. Hope this doesn't put her back in her studies
at school.
It
turned cold last night and we are in a snow blizzard now. We are
promised zero weather soon.
Mildred
had a baby girl born to her and Clarence Dec. 10th. Both Mildred and
baby are doing well.
Love to
all, Hannah
Here's gold! First of all, this letter
tells me that Laura had small-pox when she was old enough to attend
school. These days when small-pox has mostly been eliminated by
immunizations, it's hard to believe that a family member would have
this terrible disease in the twentieth century. Laura lived through
it and not only did she live through it, but she lived to a ripe old
age scar-free. That was a blessing! Not many people did. My
encyclopedia says it was the most contagious air-borne disease and
was usually considered a death sentence when people were diagnosed
with it. The current ebola epidemic in Africa should serve as an
example. People had to be isolated in quarantine to try to stop the
spread of it and when you had precious little to begin with, burning
all the personal possessions of a sick person, because back then one
didn't have anti-bacterial cleaners to sterilize the sick person's
room with as we do today, was heart-breaking as well. Young people
should realize that the risks that come with vaccinations are a lot
less than should their children get the real disease. I've seen many
young children's tombstones cemetery walking that has made
me realize how heart-breaking it must have been to lose their
precious heirs to disease outbreaks.
Second, pooled information from other
genealogists, may indicate to county historians, who also in the
region may have died from smallpox in 1929.
Third, this letter tells me that Hannah
was a compassionate woman and knew their need. It also tells me that
she lived somewhere above the equator by the weather she was
experiencing in December of 1929. And it tells me that she had been
communicating with family members,
about the birth of a baby girl (her niece). She names names! And last, but not
least, we have a sample of her handwriting!
Since I've decoded a few clues from
this letter about our family from this single sheet of paper, I can
now apply that to a family genealogy chart. For the clueless,
genealogy is like a scavenger hunt and a jig-saw puzzle all rolled
together. You have to hunt for primary documents (ie. like this
letter), then decode the clues from the documents (ie. see above),
and fit the clues together to reassemble your ancestor's lives.
(Note: And be sure to record where you obtained your clues if you
wish to be taken seriously. It has saved my bacon more than once!)
More to Read:
Another of Hannah's Letters
Written by Dolores J. Rush, Updated on 3/23/2020.
More to Read:
Another of Hannah's Letters
Written by Dolores J. Rush, Updated on 3/23/2020.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We welcome family related questions, comments, and additional information about this post and we will try to answer your questions in a timely fashion. Thanks for stopping by!